| Cliffs Shaft History - By James D. Schuster | |
|
The Cliffs Shaft Mine, Ishpeming, Michigan: 1867-1967, One Hundred Years of Mining Paper Prepared for SS3230-Industrial Archeology with Professor Dr. Patrick Martin, for Class Term Paper May 8th, 2002 James D. Schuster Civil Engineering Student On September 19th, 1844 William
A. Burt, a deputy government surveyor, was the first to discover the great Lake
Superior iron ore deposits. His survey party included Jacob Houghton, the
brother of Michigan's first state Geologist Doctor Douglas Houghton. Burt and
his party were surveying the east line of Section 1, Township 47 North, Range
27 West, just south of Teal Lake near today?s community of Negaunee. The
compass-man, Mr. Ives, began to notice fluctuation of the needle. After some
investigation, some individuals came back with specimens of iron ore from
nearby rock outcrops. Later, in June of 1845, Dr. Douglas Houghton and Mr. Burt
also came across ore samples while in the south sections of Township 47, Range
26. This was to later be named the Cascade Range near the town of Palmer
(Swineford76? p92). The following year a Mr. Philo
Marshall Everett of Jackson, Michigan, along with some of his neighbors, formed
the "Jackson Mining Company". Everett and a Mr. Jed Emmons left for
the North Country in search of copper. While in Sault Saint Marie they met
Louis Nolan who told them of the existence of iron ore in the region. Nolan and
the group made their way west to the area near Teal Lake but failed to find any
ore. The Jackson group proceeded to Copper Harbor to the north. While there
they meet up with the daughter of Chief Marji Gesick. She took them back to the
Teal Lake region. There, with Chief Gesick they found a fallen pine tree with a
deposit of iron ore imbedded in its roots. The number one open pit mine was
started near this location of the fallen tree almost immediately afterwards.
The Jackson Iron Company brought an era of iron ore mining to the Marquette
Range. In The spring of 1846 The Jackson
Mine?s President Abram V. Berry Investigated the area surrounding the mine and
noted a location to the west. After building a small cabin and taking out three
hundred pounds of ore from the site, Berry proceeded to Sault Saint Marie.
There he met a Doctor named J. Lang Cassels, an outstanding scientist from the
community of Cleveland who was going to the Upper Peninsula to see mineral
reports. Together they proceeded to the iron range and visited the site west of
the Jackson lands. Berry strategy was to bring another company into sharing the
development costs and facilities in mining the region. Soon after, seeing the
later known ?Cleveland Mountain? or ?Jasper Knob? area, there was the
application for a mining permit by Cassels at the Sault Ste Marie land office.
With this he took possession of a square mile of land from the ?Dead River
Silver and Copper Company? with the property that Cassels had viewed included
(Swineford76? p116). This land was the east half of Section 10 and the west
half of Section 11 for Township 47 North and Range 27 East. The articles of Association for the Cleveland Iron Company were
signed on November 9th 1847. The observed time for the company's
Michigan founding was on April 2nd 1850. This occurred after being aware of the
need to be recognized under the new legislation that stated that companies
mining in Michigan had to be organized and follow certain regulations. A
special charter to create the "Cleveland Iron Mining Company of
Michigan" was asked for, and accomplished with Act number 294 from the
Michigan legislation (Swineford76? p116). This Charter was soon abandoned when
in April 1853 Articles of Association were filed with a Capital Stock of
$500,000 distributed with 20,000 shares. Some of the signers were John
Outhwaite, Morgan L. Hewitt, Selah Chamberlain, and Samuel L. Mather. In the winter of 1852 the Marquette Company was sold to the
Cleveland Iron Mining Company and the title transferred on May 18th
1853. This finally ended the dispute of original claim on the property when
Cassells left the country and Captain Samuel Moody, John H Mann and Edmund C.
Rogers claimed and squatted on the property. Robert J. Graveraet with the
formed ?Marquette Iron Company? took possession of the property as a
representative of Moody, Mann, and Rogers. The old ?Marquette Iron Company?
opened the ?Little Mountain Mine?, later known as the ?Cleveland Mine?, in the
fall of 1849. That summer a barn, a boarding house, and other houses all of log
construction were built on the site (Swineford76? p116). Ore was soon collected
from the mine site. There was no need to use black powder to free the ore
collected, for the ore was accessible from the falling face of the geographical
bluff. About twenty double teams
of horses were employed during the winter months to haul ore to the company
forge that was being built at the mouth of the Carp River, on the coast of Lake
Superior. The forge was to open the following summer. The following two years
openings were started on this land in Section 10 and 11. Transportation was a
concern for the company?s leaders from the beginning. The matter of how to get
ore from the Marquette Iron Range to market hundreds of miles away had to be
solved. In December 1852, after the success of instituting them in Cleveland,
Ohio and the disfavor of building a railroad, Tower Jackson, purposed that a
plank road be built. Jackson was the Cleveland Company?s first residential mining
agent. The road would go from the ?Cleveland mountain? were their mine was
located to Lake Superior, about 17 miles away. This would allow the shipment of
ore year round rather than waiting to move it out on sleigh in winter. Also,
the plank road was thought to help boost the population of the area. The
Jackson Company was also to get involved as one of the extra benefits for them
was the transportation of charcoal for their furnace on the Carp River (Boyum
p12). The ?Plank Road? was constructed by a joint venture of the Cleveland and
Jackson Companies. It was finished in 1855 and was out dated before it was even
completed. The road did however allow people to see that there could be a
profitable future for these companies after some of the first successful
shipments were made. The first railroad, the Iron Mountain Railroad Company was
incorporated on March 14th 1855 and took control of the Plank Road.
The railroad began operation on November 1st of 1857 (Boyum p39). Soon afterwards the
Cleveland Iron Company and Lake Superior Iron Company started to construct
their first docks on Lake Superior shore in Marquette. After the completion of
the Cleveland?s level dock, the Lake Superior Company built their?s adjacent to
Cleveland?s. Their?s was a new design, twenty five feet above the water level
and with pockets to hold the ore. This was the first pocket dock in the world
(Boyum p40). The Cleveland Company remodeled their dock into a pocket dock in
1859. From Lake Superior to
Lake Huron there is an elevation change in the water levels, forming rapids
between the two lakes. This change is at Sault Ste Marie. In order for
transportation to commence through this area a modern lock system was built.
The Locks equalized elevation
making it possible for the passive of ships. Completion was on April 19, 1855.
Two months after opening the two-masted schooner ?Columbia? passed with 120
tons of ore from the Cleveland Iron Mining Company. This was the first ?major?
shipment of ore from the Lake Superior Region (Swineford76? p152). The first ore shipped from the Superior Iron Ore Range was from
the Cleveland Mine. In 1852 three thousand tons of ore were made into blooms at
the Marquette forge. The first shipment was six barrels consigned to B.L.Webb,
an agent in Detroit, on July 7th, of that year (Boyum p42). The
forge was destroyed by fire on December 15th 1853. One thousand four
hundred forty nine tons of ore from the Cleveland mine was shipped to lower
lake ports in 1855. From the first mining company on the range, the Jackson,
four hundred and forty seven tons of wrought iron was shipped from the forge in
1856. That same year the Cleveland mine was making another shipment of 6,343
tons of ore. The Iron Cliffs Company was formed in 1865 by the financier
Samuel J. Tilden and other influential New Yorkers. Tilden became the governor
of New York and eventually an unsuccessful candidate for the 1876 Presidential
election. Tilden acquired the popular vote but failed to attain the one
electoral vote needed to win over Rutherford B Hayes of Ohio. The Cliffs
Company was the first mine in the region to use dynamite in its operation when
it opened in the summer of 1867. This mine was located in the southern half of
the northeast corner of Section 9 of Township 47 Range 47, a near distance from
the workings of the Lake Superior Company?s pits to the south. The Iron Cliffs
Company named its mine the Barnum mine after the new mine president William H.
Barnum. The Chicago and North Western Railway laid a branch of their track to
the property in June of 1868, with the first shipment of the mine?s yearly
value of 14,380 tons of ore shipped out of the Marquette harbor soon afterwards
(Swineford76? p202). By 1871 the Iron Cliffs Company also owned the Tilden,
Ogden, and Foster Mines. Work on the owned Excelsior, Salisbury, Rowland, and
Pioneer (by lease from the Jackson Company) was added by 1876. The Iron Cliffs
Furnace, located in the Tilden Township near Foster Lake was completed in the
early part of 1874. The Furnace only ran part time in its early career. The Barnum mine, had an iron ore vein of sixty feet in width,
after the pit was heavily quarried before it was opened. In the center of the
vein was a wall of slate sixteen feet in width. The respective halves of ore
are therefore eighteen and twenty five feet thick on each side (Swineford71?
p55). The mine had very suitable equipment on site. The hoist was capable of
rising five hundred tons of ore in a time span of twenty-four hours with a pump
in place to keep the mine bottom from flooding. From the open pit the mine
developed three shafts located all along the north side of the pits opening. By 1883, after sixteen years of operation the Barnum pit was
becoming close to the end of its production. The pit was extended forty feet
deeper in 1882. However the vein being followed was coming close to the
property line of the Lake Superior Iron Company. The estimated time, in 1883,
that the workings would have reach the line was four years. In 1886 the reports
stated that some ore was being taken out of the far west part of the mine.
During winter, while the hanging wall experienced heavy freezing with frost,
work was commenced on robbing the supporting pillars of their ore (Anderson
p44). Even with the limited mining on the site, 20,593 tons was produced for
shipment that year. Except with the years 1890, 1893, and 1894, the pit shipped
every year from it first in 1868 until it finally closed in 1897. The total
shipment of its first-class nonbessemer ore to market was 889,862 tons. By the time the ?Old Barnum? pit was finished the ?New Barnum?
seemed to have a bright future. Living in Paris, France in 1863, a French
Engineer, named Jean Rodolphe Leschol invented the diamond drill (Boyum(geo)
p46). With the first drill being brought and used at the Lake Superior Mine in
1870, this introduced the technology for the whole Marquette Range. The ?New
Barnum? started its career when the Cliff Iron Company started the Hole Number
?A? in Section 10 on high ground over looking the swamp of Ishpeming, on March
15th 1877. On February 15th 1878, after going seventy-six
feet through surface material and reaching a depth of 628 feet with no
occurrence of ore the drilling was halted. During that time an another diamond
drill test was being performed a short distance away to the west. The drill
hole number ?B?, started on June 1st 1877. The drill proceeded to
have 74 feet of surface material then continue till ore was discovered at a
depth of four hundred to four hundred sixty feet down. Number ?B? was completed
on July of 1878 (Boyum(geo) p46). The building of the two shafts, noted as the ?A? and ?B? Shaft
of the ?New Barnum? Mine were started in the early 1880?s in the attempt to
proceed with a new approach to mining. In his written documentation of the mine
in 1883, author A. P. Swineford, editor of the mining journal in Marquette
quoted. ?The ?new? Barnum is
rapidly approaching a stage of development which gives promise of a future
yield to that of its immediate neighbors, the Lake Superior, and Cleveland. The
Large amount of money expended by the Company (Iron Cliffs) in the effort to
reach and open up a deposit lying at a depth below the surface which in the
earlier years in the history of iron mining on Lake Superior whould be
considered wholly unattainable, instead of being misspent may now be regarded
as the good seed which, through buried in the quick sand and planted in barren
rock, is just on the eve of producing an abundant harvest - a harvest that will
yield an hundred fold to shareholders in the way of profit (Swineford83?
p40).? The ?A? shaft was the first of the two to be sunk to the ore, in
approximately 1881. The shaft was well timbered with and internal dimension of
ten by fourteen feet. This extended to a depth of 424 feet, from the collar to
the ore formation. The first forty-six feet descending where to the bedrock of
the footwall, them continued further down. The workings on the main level were
soon started and by the end of 1882 they had the main Gallery or drift being
twenty feet high and eighteen feet wide. From here a drift headed east 140
feet, all with in the ore body that sank to the south and east on a forty-five
degree incline. To the west a drift proceeded in the attempt to connect with
the ?B? shaft (Swineford83? p41).
To the west at a distance of 834 feet and 81/2 inches
(Anderson p44) was the ?B? shaft. Though started at the same time as its sister
shaft, the ?B? ran into quicksand while reaching the ledge of bedrock in its
progression. The sinking an iron caisson attempt failed due to the pressure of
the quicksand. The second attempt also failed when the usual attempt of placing
cribs in the shaft also failed. The final and successful attempt of going
through the quicksand was organize and planed by an experienced Cornish miner
named Thomas Buzzo. Mr. Buzzo, taking charge of the work, incorporated the
?drop shaft?. This method was to build cribs above one another and to sink the
whole structure down the shaft. The quicksand was removed as fast as possible
so that the bottom crib could proceed downward and supplementary cribs could
continue to be place atop the system. When the bottom reached the ledge of the
bedrock, there stood a safe and solid wooden shaft with in the quicksand, ?much to the relief of all concerned (Swineford83?
p44).? Also for Thomas Buzzo ?The management gives all the credit for the
final accomplishment of the task (Swineford83? p44).? After ledge the shaft had to sink
three hundred fifty feet further to the main level that the ?A? shaft had
already reached. This was proposed to be done in the summer of 1884. at that
time drifts and galleries could also be accounted for on the west side of the
site. For these two shafts the outlook was ever changing. A. P.
Swineford from 1885, he was quoted in his written report as to the ?New Barnum?
mine. ?But the mine has proved much less
valuable than was hoped. The ore deposits are broken up where regularity was
looked for; there is a great deal more irregularity than it was expected to
find. There were some really some rose-colored theories entertained regarding
this new mine, before it was opened sufficiently to verify or discredit the
conjectures that were made. Indeed, sufficient evidence was developed, through
the systematic and thorough diamond drill borings that were made, to afford
substantial basis for the best that was hoped for (Anderson p43).? By this time the ?A? shaft had been operating for a total of
four years and the ?B? shaft was operating for one. Both shafts had descended
down to the main level, which became known as the ?c-level?. The subsequent
levels followed the ore body on a fifteen-degree slope to the southwest. The
upper levels to the north were designated as the ?a? and ?b-level?. The levels
that proceeded further down into the earth were numerically coded as the 1, 2,
and 3. From the collar of the shaft house to the main ?c-level? were 470 feet
for the ?A? shaft and 420 feet for the ?B? (Anderson p44). With the ?new Barnum? being so young by this time, with work
only being started five years prior. A fully operational facility of surface
equipment was in place. This site was ?one
of the best equipped mines in the district? (Swineford83 p42). One of
the first buildings on the site was the, ?T? shaped, stone engine house
centered between the two shafts. In this building there was a Worthington and
Cameron pump. There were also two low-pressure engines, that pumped water from
Lake Bancroft into forming steam. A Rand 16X30 duplex compressor was also
installed, providing air to the Rand No.3 numatic drills used in the
underground workings. This was accomplished through a distance of 2000 feet of
six-inch pipes placed through out the mine (Swineford83? p44). Near the then thirty foot tall iron claded ?A? shaft house was
the fan house. In it was a twelve-foot exhaust fan keeping the air with in the
mine from getting stale and uninhabitable. There were also two 48 inch boilers
and a new 14X48 Corliss engine (Swineford83? p44). Soon however, everything was
removed to transform the building into an office. The original building to the
west served as the boiler and engine house for the shaft, was converted into a
storehouse. Southeast of the engine house was the machine shop. Inside this
structure besides the machine shop was a storehouse and a black smith shop. It
was also constructed of stone, therefore, being very architecturally similar to
the engine house. Finally the new boiler house was completed before 1888 and
shared its front face next to the engine house. With the stone construction,
the two buildings almost seemed identical. The ?B? shaft house was originally smaller in comparison to the
?A?, but by 1888 that shaft too was iron claded and had a height of forty-five
feet (Sanborn 1888?). Along with the ?A? shaft, this shaft had a tram track
that was built from the base of the shaft towards the stockpile yard, on the
southern portion of the property. The two largest mining companies in
1890, on the Marquette range, were the Cleveland Iron Mining Company and the
Iron Cliffs Mining Company. An idea came that would take notice of an advantage
in the consolidation of these two companies. One advantage was the cost sharing
in the mining process. The leading men of these two companies where Samuel L.
Mather the President of the Cleveland and Jeptha H. Wade Sr. a director and the
Majority sock holder in the Iron Cliffs Company. By 1889 Wade had acquired
Seventy percent of the stock in the company. He started buying stock after his
retirement as the Financier, Industrialist, and Founder of the Western Union
Telegraph Company. The two men laid the plans for the joining of the two
companies. Unfortunately Mather and Wade died before the merger was complete.
The responsibility of the job fell to their decedents William Gwinn Mather son
of Samuel and Jeptha Wade Jr. the grandson of Japtha Sr. The joining of the two
companies became final on May 7th 1891, forming the ?Cleveland-Cliffs Iron
Company?. William Mather became the first president of this new corporation and
would lead its progress for several decades. In the 1890?s the mine continued to
operate under its new ownership. A crusher was added in 1894 with the demand
made for the ore by the furnace men (Newett p101). The new main offices for the
Cleveland Cliffs Iron Mining Company were started in the 1897 just northwest of
the mines ?A? Shaft. Of the two structures built, one would serve as the
general office and the engineering office wing would be connected with it
through a small corridor. The wooden dry at the mine burned to
the ground on December 1st 1901. A ?dry? is a miners name for a
changing house used before and after work. Due to the continues risk of fire
and the immediate need for such a facility, a new dry was soon built in the
spring of 1902. This building was incorporated with brick into its construction
to reduce the continuous risk of fire. This structure was similar but also very
different to the referred to changing house in West Vulcan (Mennie p121). The
loss of the other dry was quite a financial loss to the company, not just the
building but with the miners? property destroyed as well. The dry?s original dimensions were
one hundered and thirty feet four inches by thirty feet four inches. The inner
height was eleven feet from the floor to the bottom of the roof truss. The base
foundation was set stones with concrete laid on top, and the walls were a set
of erected bricks with an air gap in the middle to prevent sweating. A main
design that gave the exterior brick walls their interesting ribbed décor was
the extra course of bricks that made up the wall piers that the wooden roof
trusses were perched. The trusses are 6-inch by 6-inch timbered beams that span
from one side of the dry to the other. They are space at first for a distance
of 7 feet 8 inches in the washroom, and 7 feet 11 inches in the changing room.
The roof?s coverings were 2-inch boards of pine with another layer of 1-inch
hemlock, having a 1-inch spaced gap of air in the middle. The floor gave
adequate drainage through grading and sewers, for the showers and sinks (Mennie
p124). The Change room was dimensioned to a
size of 28 by 54 feet with 126 lockers that were 1-foot by 1-foot by 5-feet in
size. With these lockers used for street clothe the room could serve to
accommodate 252 men in a day of operations. Also within the room were drying
racks, which were vented through 16-inch ?star? vents on the roof of the
building. To the north of this room is the 28 by 46 foot room of the washroom.
Here there were three wash troughs with both hot and cold water that was piped
in to be used with enamel coated iron washbasins. This system for the miners to
wash up, was from the Beacon mine owned by the Champion Iron Co. Located
eighteen miles to the west. Also with in the room were ten showers stalls
(Mennie p124). The three rooms to the north were a
janitors closet and two 11-foot by 11-foot 6-inch rooms, One was used by the
shift boss as a office and changing room and the other served as an emergency
hospital room. The room to the south of the changing room served as an
experimental dining room. The hope was that the changing room would stay
cleaner in the process. The heating of the building was
accomplished through a Webster vacuum system that used exhaust steam brought
though iron pipes to radiate from locations in the rooms. Such locations were
under lockers, benches, and clothe racks. This modern facility constructed for
the miners was completed for a cost of $6,604.26 and was situated on the shore
bank of Lake Bancroft just north of the boiler house (Mennie p126). The independent tramways for each of
the shafts gave way to a single connected tramway so that both shafts could
supply ore to a single pocket in the middle of the site. The first generation
of this operation was built sometime between 1897 and 1904. The tracks went
north of the engine house to an ore crusher that then fed another tramway to
the ore pocket. A symmetric tramway was then built to travel south and in front
of the boiler and engine house to feed the ore pocket. Also around the turn of
the century the official name of the mine changed from the ?New Barnum Mine? to
the ?Cliffs Shaft Mine?, but for decades to come the miners would refer to the
site as the ?Barnum Mine? At the end of
the second decade of the twentieth century, the ageing shaft houses of the ?A?
and ?B? needed to be replaced. These shaft houses with their wooden
construction had become unstable and unsafe due their deterioration. By this
time the Cliffs Shaft mine had become a critical operation by being the largest
producer of hard hematite ore on the Marquette iron range. The decision to
proceed with the construction of new structures was made in the spring of 1919
and tentative plans were conceived to replace the buildings. The first was to
create a similar structure to replace the older, being also of wooden
construction. Another plan was to radically change the structure with the
majority uses of steel in the building project. The third and final concept was
the use of reinforced concrete to encapsulate the older structure in the
processes of creating the new shaft house (Hayden p124). The first purposed solution to the dilemma was soon rejected for
the mine itself was foreseen to have a long future of production and another
set of wooden shaft houses would eventually need to be replaced. Another
problem was that there was a greater chance of fire due to the near proximity
to other facilities on the property. The second plan was also discouraged due
to the high cost of steel at that time. Another factor was the time needed to
deliver the steel and the interference of operations due to the construction
and erection of a new facility. One observation at the time was that there was
a presence of hard gravel well suited for concrete located just two hundred
feet west of the ?B? shaft. Also, the desire for the shafts not to lose
production time was sought for. The cost of ore was high and peak production
was needed to take advantage of this situation in the markets. The aspect of
labor was another helpful situation as the use of unskilled workers was
available to work the job of this type. When the final decision of the method of action was presented to
the then current Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Companies President William Gwinn
Mather, he took a personal interest in the project. He was aware that this
specific mine was located in the downtown region of Ishpeming and was a very
predominate facility on the skyline. Mather, a very distinguished man, had the
personal belief that the aesthetics of the structures should be as important as
their functionality. Mather spent time of every summer in his Swiss chalet,
which sat on top of a nearby hill and overlooked the town of Ishpeming. He was
involved in many local charities and activities, and when it came to this
project he wanted the structures to be as ornate as possible and to have
?architectural Beauty? (Hayden p127). Cleveland-Cliffs sent their plans to the
Condron Company, structural engineers, of Chicago Illinois to formulate the
project. The consulting architect for the structure was the much renowned
George Washington Maher, also of Chicago. George Maher by this time had become
a successful architect. In the early days Maher was a fellow draftsman like
Frank Lloyd Wright, both working for the office of J. L. Silsbee in 1887. By
the 1890?s Maher had started his own practice. Through his career he had
designed many suburban homes and community facilities. For the Cliffs Shaft,
Maher submitted three designs, each being more detailed than the other. With
William G Mather?s persistence, the most elaborated design was chosen; even
after the facts were made that there would be an ever-increasing cost to the
details incorporated. The forms were obelisk shaped with Egyptian revival
detail. Maher died only a few years later, after committing suicide on
September 12, 1926. The shaft houses were part of his last era designs. Even though the two shaft houses were mirrored copies of each
other, they were not exactly the same. The designs called for the structure to
have, at ground level, a squared inner dimension of 33 feet to rise 31 feet.
The walls where then to incline inward to a squared side of 21 feet located 88
feet 9 inches above the foundation. The walls were then toped off, at an
elevation of 96 feet 9 inches, with a pyramidal roof. All work was to be clear of the original shaft houses still
operating when work was started for both the ?A? and ?B? shafts on July 21st
1919. These would remain unchanged in the construction giving an addition of
the new shaft house one side. There was a mandatory positioning of all-internal
supports poured for the new building to be with in the mandated available
openings in the older assembly. The work required a total of 132 days of work
for each shaft with 55 of those days pouring the concrete and 77 days building
the forms. The largest amount of concrete poured in one day was a total of 52
cubic yards. Shaft house ?A? was the first of the two completed when work
finished on December 6th. This facility had a total of 725 cubic
yards of concrete poured into its forms. Five days later on December 11th
the ?B? shaft was completed, with 1014 cubic yards of concrete. The work
alternated between the two shafts. Concrete was poured in sections along the
project. As the forms were being filled for one shaft project they were being
extended for the other. The footings processes mirrored the sinking of the
shafts nearly forty years before. The ?A? shaft had very little conflict in the
setting 25 pound rail three feet for its footings. However, the quicksand issue
that the ?B? shaft had gone through decades before had left a creator that was
later filled in with rubble and did not leave stable ground for the new
structure. The footing for this shaft house had to go down to a maximum
distance of 26 feet to gain the stability needed. The final castings of concrete
were mixed with the use of kerosene blowers to a temperature of eighty degrees
and a kept warm with tarps and steam radiators to proceed due to the
ever-cooling temperatures. The forms were removed and the new concrete
structures stood alone. They became the only concrete structures, for an iron
mine, to be used as shaft houses, in the United States (Stakel p119) The final architectural form that each building took by Maher?s
designs and construction process where buildings of the immense beauty that
were sought for from the beginning. Elongated windows were patterned all along
the four inclined exterior walls. The base had columned aches-ways situated on
three of the sides with concrete molded CCI logos adorning each one. On the
final fourth side of the base was an extension of the structure to form around
the pocket that was originally put in 1910, this was were the ore was raised to
fill the taming cars to move ore the center of the site. When the forms were
finally removed and the new concrete structures stood alone forming a whole new
visual image of the Cliffs Shaft Mine. Charles Stakel became the superintendent of the Ishpeming
district mines for Cleveland-Cliff on July 1st 1929. He took charge
of the Cliffs Shaft, the Holmes, and the Tilden mines along with his prior
duties being at the Morris-Lloyd and Section Six mine in the North Lake
district. Stakel only a few years earlier had ovoided death when he went to
work over at the Morris-Lloyd rather than to the Barnes-Hecker Mine, after his
wife had taken the car to town one morning. On that morning of November 3rd
1926, at 11:04, the mine inspector, who Stakel was going to accompany at the
mine, perished along with 50 other men. The Barnes-Hecker flooded within ten
minutes from the first notion that anything was wrong. Only one man survived
the tragedy of that day. This became the third worst mine disaster, not in a
coal mine, in the United States. Charles Stakel had inherited the
Cliffs Shaft, which had become an older mine by this time, and made the best
attempt to change it for the better. Stakel had no prior experience of the
underground layout, so he spent hours studying maps of all the adits and stopes
for the various levels. Lucien Eaton, superintendent from 1912 to 1929, had
mentioned to Stakel that ?The ore bodies were close to exhaustion and the mine
would probably close within two to three years? (Stakel p119). The lump ore
produced by the mine was very valuable however, and Stakel was determined to
find more in the mine?s workings. Lump ore was used as a lever by the sales
department to dispose of their soft ore stockpiles. Also lump ore reduced the
oxidation of iron in open-hearth furnaces, allowing ten percent more pig iron
to be formed. This was a selling point that could not be over looked. With the
Republic mine being inactive, the Cliffs Shaft was the only producer for the
Cleveland-Cliffs Company. Charles Stakel knew it was a daunting task ahead of
him. As he had said years later, ?I knew that it (Cliffs) was a geological
puzzle of faults and cross faults? (Stakel p119). This made the simple idea of
following the ore nearly impossible. After much investigation and diamond
drilling, more ore was discovered. Just north of Euclid Street and under Lake
Bancroft, the Bancroft Vein was discovered. The company also opened the
South-East Vain. Later there was a lease taken out on the Oliver Mining
Company, formerly the Lake Superior Iron Company, with its holdings just south
of Division Street. This was known as the Section 10 Lease. More ore was even
found later when a long adit was made to the Cooper Lake Road area to the west,
raising the extreme west ore bodies. Charles Stakel also proceeded to
hire more men and utilize more equipment such as more scrapers The skip
hoisting shifts were extended for an additional shift each day. The production
of the mine went from a yearly 250,000 tons to 800,000 tons. Most of the ore
was shipped to the east but some ore made it as far as Texas and Alaska. One innovation started, but not new
to the old way of mining was to rob the support pillars of their valuable ore.
The concern here was that subsidence was not an acceptable issue due to the
fact that the town of Ishpeming was directly above the mine. It was noticed
that in the more recent areas of operation that the rooms had gotten bigger and
the pillars had become smaller compared to their older counter parts. The
original workings looked like a checkerboard on the maps, for the rooms and
pillars had similar dimensions of twenty-five to thirty feet. After reading
some technical literature which explained that other mines were mining the
referred to ?unavailable ore?, Stakel contacted the man who could make the
judgment on a similar operation at the Cliffs site. Dr.Leonard Obert, chief of the applied
physics branch of the United States Bureau of Mines, came to the Cliffs. Mr. S.
R. Elliot, the then manager of the mines was not in favor of the idea for he
saw that the current situation had not caused a problem in fifty years and he
was not willing to disturb pillars that might develop into a problem for the
population above. Elliot relented and a test was performed on certain pillars
in the mine. After much calculation it was determined that the pillared columns
were under no pressure and that they could be reduced in size. Mining of the
?unavailable ore? was allowed but in locations to the west, away from the
downtown location (Stakel p123). Towards the middle of the century
the Cliffs Shaft had become the largest mine in the Ishpeming area. The Mine
had by that time aggregated the properties of all the other encompassing mine.
These mine included the ?School House?, The ?Moro? (known as the ?K? shaft in
the late 1800?s) and the ?Cleveland Mine? also known as the ?Marquette Mine?.
The ?Cleveland Hard Ore Mine? was included with its different open pits and
shafts. The ?Saw Mill? and ?Incline? were two of these pits. Three of the most
active shafts where the number ?2?, ?3?, and ?5?. The ?Number 3? engine house
still stands today on the corner of Seventh Street and Division. It is of the
same vintage as the engine house for the Cliffs Shaft, dating back before 1884.
The ?Hard Ore Mine?s? neighbor to the north, the Cliffs, also took the ?New
York mine? into possession (Sanborn 1904). Speaking to old miners who worked at
the Cliffs Shaft while it operated gave insight into the life of the miner.
When interviewed, Arvid Korpi stated that in case of emergency, one alternate
route to leave the mine was to exit out of the ?Selwood mine? (Korpi 1999). On
the official record there is no such mine. During the 1870?s a Joseph Selwood,
from the Copper district of the Keweenaw, however had became for a short time
the manager of the ?Incline mine?. For a time later there was a section of the
Incline mine referred to the ?Selwood Pit? By the 1950?s the Company of
Cleveland-Cliffs knew in order to economically operate the Cliffs Shaft Mine
that a new shaft with modern facilities and equipment was needed to be designed
and built. Mr. R.J. Schaal, Chief Mechanical
Engineer for Cleveland-Cliffs met with Aros Electric, Inc. from March 7th
to 10th in Ishpeming. Aros Electric, Incorporated, from 16 East 71st
Street New York 21, N.Y., was a United States representatives of ASEA (Allmanna
Svenska Elektriska Aktiebolaget) From Sweden. ASEA had started by Ludvig
Fredholm establishing Elektriska Aktiebolaget in Stockholm as manufacturers of
electric lighting and generators in 1883. By the 1950?s ASEA was a major
supplier to power, steel, mining, and transport industries. The decided design for the new Shaft
was the ASEA Friction-Drive ?Koepe? Hoists. The arrangement was a singe cage
hoist and a pair of independent skip hoists to bring men and material to and
from the surface. As with a form already utilized in Sweden, The hoists were to
be placed in the head frame, vertically above the shaft. This arrangement gave
practically no s-bend on the hoist ropes and the ropes would be shorter and
shielded from the weather. Friedrich Koepe originally invented
the Friction-Drive ?Koepe? Hoist in 1877. Koepe living from 1835-1922 applied
the technology initially to a 234 meters shaft while working for the Friedrich
Krupp Company. The design showed the way for the modern skyscraper elevator.
The concept was that a hoisting rope passed over the hoisting drum once with
the load at one end and a counter weight suspended on the other. With the
friction of the rope on the drum enough to prevent slipping one load could
ascend while the other side would descend. The plans called for hoisting capacities
of 430 long tons in an hour with a depth of 1272 ft. This operation could be
completed during the day shift. The man cage could hoist seventy-five men or
15,000 pounds on a single trip. The Skips were capable of hoisting 30,000
pounds from the crushing unit located at the bottom of the shaft to the
surface. The Swedish engineering firm
Allmanna Betongbyggnadsbryan produced the preliminary designs for the
construction of the head frame in the summer of 1952. Formal orders for the
Hoists were filed by the end of that year. The
multi-roped hoists were delivered to the site in the fall of 1954. The base
tower was already poured with concrete by a firm from Oshkosh Wisconsin
contracted by Cleveland-Cliffs Company. During the summer of 1955 the Equipment
was installed. The work was completed in October and operations started one
December 2nd. The 174ft tower dwarfed every other structure in town
including the structures of the ?A? and ?B? Shafts. With the completion of the ?C? shaft the operations with in each
of the obelisk fell silent. The ?A? and ?B? shafts were later caped with a
process of placing a concrete slab, the arrangement of fifteen feet of gravel
atop it and the pouring of another concrete slab at the surface. The facilities
with in the ?A? shaft were scraped out and salvaged, leaving a huge shell of a
building that resembled more an industrial cathedral than a mine?s shaft house.
The trestles works for the two shafts were removed and the large crushing plant
disappeared from the mine site altogether. With all efforts made to modernize the mine, the end was finally
near. This was no ill-conceived guess either. The Cliffs Shaft had been a very
productive operation, however the changing of the guard was to occur and the
era of underground mining was coming to and end. The markets no longer
supported the need for lump ore and new operations had arisen over the process
of taconite pellet production. On December 22nd 1967 the Cliffs Shaft mine closed.
This ended the longest operation of an underground iron mine in the world. With
the ground breaking of the ?Old Barnum? pit in 1867 to the last hoist of a skip
full of ore on a Friday afternoon in 1967, the operations for this small
location in the far north of Michigan operated for a hundred years. The test
shafts of ?New Barnum? mine had become the expansive operations of the ?Old
Cliffs Shaft?. The last shipment for the mine was conducted on the 6th
of October 1972. 2000 tons of ore were shipped by Lake Superior and Ishpeming
railcars to the Marquette Presque Isle dock. The occasion was noted with the
traditional Christmas tree and pair of old overturned boots, to signify the end
of the life of the mine. This shipment of ore, going to the Jones and Laughlin
Steel Corporation in Cleveland, finished the 26,845,000 long tons that came out
of the mine?s ?A?, ?B?, and ?C? shafts. The individuals present that day to see
the final send off, where Nick Conte, Keith Ayres, and Earl Pleau, employees of
LS&I. The Cleveland Cliffs Employees included sampler, Irving Korpi, chief
ore grader, Max Madsen, all rail shipment clerk, Bill Reichel, and the shovel
runner, Phil Marketty. Cleveland Cliffs in 1997 celebrated their 150-year anniversary,
and the still standing forms of the ?A? and ?B? shafts represented as symbols
of this long and extraordinary history. On September 17th 1998, after the guiding influence
of Burton H. Boyum, the majority of the property of the Cliffs Shaft mine was
given to the ?Marquette Range Iron Mining Heritage Theme Park Inc.? With this
gift, the attempt would be made to preserve the site and for the visiting
public, present and interoperate the unique history of the area. Brief Bibliography Manuscript Collections Bentley Historical Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Clarke Historical Library, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI
Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company Archives, Ishpeming, MI Copper Country Historical Collections, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI
John Longyear Research Library, Marquette County Historical Society, Marquette, MI
Published Works Burton H. Boyum . The Marquette Mineral District of Michigan, second edition. (Ishpeming, MI; The Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company, n.d.) Burton H. Boyum . The Saga of Iron Mining in Michigan. ( Marquette, MI: John M. Longyear Research Library, 1983). T.L. Condren. "Shaft Houses of Imposing Architecture at the Ishpeming (Michigan) Mine of the Cleveland Cliffs Iron Company," Journal of the Western Society of Engineers 26 (1921), pages 22-32. Lucien Eaton. "Present Scraping Practices at the Cliffs Shaft Mine," Lake Superior Mining Institute Proceedings 24 (l926). Lucien Eaton. "Method and Cost of Mining Hard Specular Hematite on the Marquette Iron Range, Michigan," Lake Superior Mining Institute Proceedings 27 (1929). Harlan Hatcher. A Century of Iron and Men. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1950. Walter Havighurst. Vein of Iron: The Pickands Mather Story. Cleveland: World Publishing Company, 1956. J. Ellzey Hayden and Lucien Eaton. "Building Reinforced-Concrete Shaft Houses," Lake Superior Mining Institute Proceedings 22 (1922). Charles K. Hyde. The Upper Peninsula of Michigan: An Inventory of Historical Engineering and Industrial Sites. Washington, DC: HAER, 1978. John Mennie. "A New Changing House at the Cliffs Shaft Mine," Lake Superior Mining Institute Proceedings 9 ( 1903). William H. Mulligan, Jr., editor. Historic Resources of the Iron Range in Marquette County, Michigan, 1844-1941. Negaunee, MI: The Economic Development Corporation of the County of Marquette, 1991. William H. Mulligan, Jr. National Register of Historic Places Nomination for Cliffs Shaft Mine Site, 1991. George A. Newett. "The Marquette Iron Range of Michigan," Lake Superior Mining Institute Proceedings 4 (1896). George A. Newett. "The Marquette Iron Range," Lake Superior Mining Institute Proceedings 14 (1909). Arthur T. North. "Engineers and Architects in Artistic Collaboration," The American Architect, December 15, 1920, pages 783-787, 79l . Alvah L. Sawyer. A History of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and its People. 2 vols. Chicago: The Lewis Publishing Company, 1891. © James D. Schuster, 2002. Society for Industrial Archeology Comments: jdschust@mtu.edu | |
| - |